In the last two posts, I have in some way attacked the dictionary definition of feminism and went against the definition of feminism that many gave at our graduate orientation that feminism is everything and anything. Being someone that likes tidy definitions that definition never sat well with me. This morning while reading the introduction to Rebecca Walker’s anthology, “To be Real: Telling the Truth and Changing the Face of Feminism”, I found myself agreeing with her views. She describes her life before beginning the anthology as being a world where she carefully considered every decision she made, person she met, word she uttered to ensure that it measured up to belief in what was morally and politically right according to her vision of feminism which she thought was defined as “feminist empowerment”. Because of this she found herself being unable to truly be her self. I believe that many so called feminists suffer from this problem of either thinking that by being a feminist they cannot be themselves or think they cannot be a feminist because they are being themselves. When describing our feminist practices we need to shy away from using “either/or” to describe ourselves but instead use “and” and stay true to ourselves. In doing so we will create feminist spaces in which we can be real instead of trying to live in feminist spaces where we cannot be ourselves.
This point is something I've always struggled with as a feminist, but I think ultimately that struggle is a good thing, because for so many people their place in the social world is largely unquestioned. I definitely agree that it is important to be true to yourself, with the acknowledgement that everyone is a product of their social environment. It also seems important to look at why we like what we like, why we dress the way we do, and interact with people in a certain manner, but if all we ever did was analyze and critique and monitor, we would go absolutely crazy. Sometimes it's nice to just enjoy life :)
ReplyDelete